There is someone I know who is a racist. Not in a string black men up by their necks or make them eat and live elsewhere kind of way, but in a you're black because you're not as righteous as me kind of way.
Since I feel the need to provide evidence in this case...
This person visited in my home some years ago. He sat and expounded his beliefs that the 'mark' of a black skin was a punishment from God, due to a lack of commitment in a pre-earthly battle among the spirits.
His argument is that even though the LDS Church has extended privileges to black members in recent years, it is a mistake, and that black people will not now, nor ever have rights to the same privileges as white people.
In hindsight, I should have asked him to either shut his mouth or leave.
Mrs Koda, who was present at the time, and confirms my recollection of the incident actually caught my eye as I walked into the room, and mouthed the words... "Go Outside" to me.
I mentioned this incident on my blog shortly thereafter, and have since been told that I am mistaken and that no such doctrines were ever taught or put forth by this person.
I suspect he still actively believes this bullshit (for lack of a better word), but something has changed.
Similar situation... There is a State Senator in Utah, who is quite frankly a bigot and a moron (Not to mention an active Mormon too). I was thinking about him, because I was going through the Constitutional Amendments I'm supposed to vote in in the next couple of weeks, and he is vehemently opposed to one of them. The problem is, I'm having a hard time separating him from his position. He's a douche-bag, so naturally I'm assuming his position is wrong. It probably is... He's opposing measures which have been proposed to help stem corruption, but that's a topic for another day.
This same douche-bag politician, got himself in some hot water a while back, for saying to a camera crew that he felt that homosexuals were there biggest threat to the American way of life.
His defense when those comments later appeared in "8 - The Mormon Proposition"
They tricked me. They were talking about their LDS missions, and one of them was wearing a BYU shirt.
That's just a lousy argument, but I think it illustrates the same problem as the first story.
There seems to be a circle of trust within Mormonism.
Within the circle you can be a homophobic, hate-spewing bigot, and you can feel reasonably secure that no-one will turn you into the gays.
Outside the circle however, you love all your brothers and sisters and only want what is best for them, and to help them come to Christ through love and kindness.
Within the circle, you can be a white-supremacist, bigoted racist and generally those around you will nod in assent at your keen gospel insights.
Outside the circle, you love all your brothers and sisters and welcome all to the fold. Racism and Mormonism? Why the two are completely incompatible. The Church simply appeared racist because of the norms of the day. The time just wasn't right and that kind of thing.
There is other stuff too.
Inside the circle, it's safe to assume that anyone who votes other than Republican in the elections is a sinner.
Outside the circle - Why the Church is and always has been politically neutral.
Inside the circle, you can become a God.
Outside the circle, I don't know that we teach such a thing.
It's been interesting moving from inside the circle to out. And I'll be honest that I find it mildly amusing to see how people treat me differently based on my position, relative to the circle of trust, or at least my position, based on their perceptions.
The really sad thing is that a lot of these ridiculous notions that have cropped up are the result of some people being too proud and/or stupid to simply say, "I don't know the answer," so they make something up that makes them appear smart.
ReplyDeleteVery good analogy. Interestingly, I believe many of those inside the circle lack the self-insight to recognize the discrepancies between their public vs. private (or inner circle) beliefs that you've pointed out. There is something about the process of leaving that circle that makes people -- for lack of a better term -- smarter? Something about learning to think more critically and being forced to take a hard look at themselves. They are more insightful and more honest. Just my lay observation.
ReplyDeleteIn Islam they call this taqiyya. FLDS groups still use the term "Lying for the Lord," which was a term established by the LDS Church before the manifesto to justify concealing true beliefs to outsiders.
ReplyDeleteI really wanted to blog about this sort of crap but I just couldn't stay on topic. I keep rambling on about all the crap and baggage that this sort of shit stirs up. Awareness of this sort of stuff was a huge breakthrough for me many years ago but I'm still a huge bloody rotten hypocrite when it comes all of it in many aspects of my life. Needless to say I felt guilty as hell. Bleh, I'm such an ass. The best I could do is just make references to "Lying for the Lord" in past posts. But I'm really not all that upset. I'm just experiencing an extraordinarily guilty conscience.
ReplyDeleteThanks for expressing it here and making it nice and coherent.
Douche-bag....that says it all...end of story!
ReplyDelete*gasp!* Traitor. You're NOT supposed to tell non-believers about the cool racist jokes. Duh!
ReplyDeleteSorry Carla!!
ReplyDeleteOK, so here's a question...
With the Muslims and the Fundamentalists, it would seem that the need to lie to protect the religion is overt and a conscious decision.
Within Mormonism though, is it conscious? Do Mormons know they're doing it, or are they so deluded they simply do it by default?
It seems that "Are they Mormon?" and "Are they active?" are both key questions when meeting a new person. But do these consciously translate into what you share with the person or is it all subconscious?
I know I used to do it, but I honestly can't tell if I knew what I was doing, or was just doing it instinctively.
One things for damn sure... Life has become a lot simpler since I left. My only concern now is offending people still in the midst of it.
How disturbing -- one set of doctrines for religious insiders, and another that they present to the world. Sadly, the Catholic church has used a similar strategy.
ReplyDeleteP.S. -- Thank you for adding my blog to your blogroll!
...shaking my head in sympathetic recollection of similar experiences...
ReplyDeleteAfter which I got the apologetic and obligatory "The Church is still perfect even if the people aren't" from my faithful friends. To which I now reply, ipso facto, "Then your self-delusion is greater than the one being imposed upon you."