Saturday, December 11, 2010

Hot and Cold

Several leaders of the LDS Church have made comments to the effect that the organization is either the true Church of God, or it is the biggest fraud in the history of the world.

I don't know if I'd go as far as calling it the biggest fraud in the history of the world. Perhaps Christianity in general could bear that distinction, but Mormonism while significant to some people, really isn't that big.

The thing is, that the evidence would seem to suggest that it isn't 100% true, and therefore if you apply the logic of it's leaders, it must be false.

One of the best things about leaving, is the addition of color to my thinking. For too long, there was only black or white, but now there is a whole lot more. People aren't just good or bad and choices are either right or wrong. The whole world is just so much more than that, with more to consider, account for and appreciate.

When I found out Mormonism wasn't true, I tried to be luke warm about it. I'd go along with it for the sake of my family, and community relations. I mean, the Church does do some good stuff, so it can't be all bad.

One of the things which my father said to me, in the midst of the 'discussion' about whether I would allow him to come into my home and correct my erroneous understanding of the gospel, was that I had to choose. I couldn't be half in half out. I either had to commit 100%, or request to have my name removed from the Church records.

I thought he was wrong at the time, but he was right.

Mormonism isn't the real world. Mormonism is a state of mind, where everything is black and white, and every minute detail of your life is manipulated and judged by God and his assistants - actually it's mostly by his assistants - the bishops, presidents, and even your neighbors.

My time trying to straddle the Mormon fence didn't last very long, and I arrived at the point where I had to choose to be 100% in or leave.

The thing is though, when I try and explain that, other Mormons just don't get it, and to be fair, I don't quite get it either. If church attendance is voluntary, which did I feel I had to choose.

I think I've figured it out though, and in the process, I think I'm closer to identifying the key reason behind my not wanting to be a part of it as well.

It all comes down to loyalty. A lot of people don't like the word cult, but since the last big conference, where 2 speakers rehashed a talk about blind obedience to the leader, and the need to sacrifice thinking for obedience, I think cult may be an appropriate description.

One of the other items I've seen in cult descriptions is the concept of loyalty tests. You know how when a young man joins a gang, sometimes they'll ask him to do stuff, to prove his loyalty? Mormonism is kind of the same.

Mormons have temple recommends. It's a piece of paper which gives you access to the temple. It's the ultimate loyalty test I think.

The problem was... I didn't have one, causing doubt in the leaders minds about my loyalty to the cause.

So they came up with other tests. Little things here and there... Will you do this? Will you do that?

I've noticed it even with friends who find out I'm not active anymore. They want to know why, and they feel the need to check on aspects of my belief which they feel I should have.

Loyalty tests... The continued testing of my local leaders and neighbors is what drove me out.

And that made me consider my reasons for leaving.

There are historical issues. The founder was a sexual deviant, a con man and an all around charleton. But he did actually have some good ideas and teachings, and when you go back in any religion, there are skeletons in the closet. Mormonism is just nice and new, so the skeletons are easy to find.

But that wasn't it.

They purposefully lie about the history though. Fabricate more appealing versions of history, and intentionally prevent members from seeing evidence of the more disturbing history.

"Some things which are true, do not need to be shared."

I used to think that was why I left. It was the lying and the dishonesty.

But every organization lies to protect it's members. Doesn't mean it's right, but it's just a fact.

What bugs me most, is the manipulation. That ties into the lying, because they lie to manipulate. They also induce fear, prey on insecurities and invoke peer pressure.

I don't like being used, and yet I was raised in a way which made me a prime target. I'm still battling it.

Good Mormons are raised to be used and abused. Cannon fodder for the good of the corporation.

11 comments:

  1. Koda~

    I'm curious... This paragraph: "When I found out Mormonism was true, I tried to be luke warm about it. I'd go along with it for the sake of my family, and community relations. I mean, the Church does do some good stuff, so it can't be all bad." Did you mean that? When you found it was true you were lukewarm? I'm just curious, because it caught my attention and I actually related to it because when *I* found out it was true, I was actually lukewarm and that reaction was what caused me to start questioning it. I didn't have a burning in my bosom or none of the fancy stuff they speak of in the church. Lukewarm.

    Also, I relate to your comment about straddling the fence. I actually write about that in "Above the Clouds." I had a moment where I really realized I was straddling and had to make a concise, conscious choice to get on one side or the other. Interestingly enough, the moment came on the heels of remembering a mutual lesson where the teacher said, "In the last days, those who are straddling the fence will be judged the most harshly."

    That teaching backfired in my case.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes and No... If I had been single at the time, I probably would have just walked away. Being lukewarm was just the easy thing to do. I think the "Church doing some good" was just an attempt to try and justify it to myself. Perhaps in someway, hanging around has actually increase the anger I feel toward the corporation.

    It is funny though, how statements to try and spur you into full commitment sometimes have the opposite effect on us though!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm not one to correct typos in blogs, but this one significantly changes the meaning, so I thought I'd let you know: "When I found out Mormonism was true" - you meant "Mormonism wasn't true" right?

    I agree, the last conference's references to (and direct quotes of) Benson's 14 fundamentals ... creeped me out, to say the least.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yikes!! Thanks Carla - that wasn't a typo - that was just plain WRONG!!

    It had been corrected. Phew!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Bingo! Loyalty tests
    This loyalty test behavior actually got ingrained in my DNA in a really bad way from my upbringing. I've become aware of how subconsciously I have been a executor of these evil tests. And not just in use as a religious test when I was a Mormon, but in all relationships I've ever had.

    I don't think the religion itself is the cause. It comes from other developmental factors. But what I do believe is that religion, especially cult like religions, more less amplify it to 11. And I think for me, was one of the main reasons it took me so long to get out. It took a really long time to realize that this stuff is dysfunctional. It's not the way healthy people work.

    Even so, I still fall into my old traps of testing people. When I first became aware of it as a test a few years ago, I though it was something to be proud of. I know now it's a sick twisted co-dependency that needs to stop!

    ReplyDelete
  6. I had never looked at this way before. Loyalty tests. But it true. I agree, I always had a sense that you were in or you were out. They can smell the disbelief on you. They will leave the guilt-ridden inactive alone to a degree because they know that the guilt will get to them or that they feel bad about their inactivity. The nonbelieving and unapologetic inactive is another thing entirely. Much hard to manipulate the one that doesn't believe...

    Great post.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This has become a personal phrase lately, "Why is the church even attempting to try and claim it's not a cult when it all it does lately is provide evidence to the contrary?"

    What I've definitely found is how the corporation has effectively hijacked everything that's good about the original church. One commenter over at Rock's blog made a good point about how we can prove that we don't view Joseph Smith as a demigod because the D&C is full of times God rebuked/chastised him for his bone-headed mistakes, but you see nothing like that for any of his successors in the Utah breakaway and it's especially bad today when everyone heaps claims of perfection on Thomas Monson and he does nothing to correct them.

    I recall hearing one GA comment wherein he said, "If President Hinckley was here and heard me praising him so much, he'd poke me with his cane and tell me to stop talking about him and start testifying of Christ." Isn't that what he's supposed to do anyway?

    ReplyDelete
  8. I've used almost exactly the same analogy. Coming out has been like taking off a pair of monochrome sunglasses that were put on me at birth. I now see the millions of brilliant colors in the world like I never imagined before. I still see the one single color I used to think was the sum total of reality, but I see so many more too. I can't imagine ever going back to a monochrome world.

    ReplyDelete
  9. We had an interesting experience last night... We got to hang out with a couple of other ex-mo couples.

    One thing that I've noticed since I've started to step away, is that I can accept other people's ideas and beliefs, even though I might not agree with them. I've always just thought it was part of my upbringing, and more to do with family than religion...

    Anyway, so the other couples were talking about when they first got introduced each other (We were the newbies), and the one guy talked about how he'd gotten a little tipsy and then gotten into a debate about legalizing drugs - or something similar.

    He remarked how it had been a revelation that night, that he could disagree with someone, and yet still be friends afterward.

    Just another color in the great rainbow of my new life!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Yeah, same here, I don't hold fast to opinions, as I used to. I can allow other people to have their own opinions and be ok with it. Because it's exactly how I would want to be treated.

    But when growing up in the church, we were basically taught not to associate with those that don't hold our same values. That required us to be intolerant of other peoples views and experiences.

    ReplyDelete
  11. My really long and profound comment got swallowed by google.

    Your colors analogy reminded me of one of my favorite books, The Giver, by Lois Lowry. You should read it.

    I also wrote lots of other crap about failing loyalty tests, and how it sucks and why I have two blogs, but I'm mad now and it would probably have lots of cussing in it, and I don't want to be the first one to drop the f-bomb on this string of comments.

    ReplyDelete

Go ahead! Tell me how you really feel!